Suffrago UK Data Hub
RankingsVerificationMethods

Independent service run by Suffrago – not an official government website. Every figure comes from an official UK publisher under its open licence and is checked against that source each time the data is refreshed.

Agency children's social workers by council, England

Official statistics

Agency child and family social workers as a share of all child and family social workers in post, full-time equivalent, for each council with children's services in England as the Department for Education publishes them, with its regions and England, as at 30 September 2025 and 2024, from the Department for Education.

England

13.0%

2025

Latest check failed – showing figures verified against source 6 November 2026, 06:57 UTC
Agency children's social workers by council, England
  • 2025
  • 2024
0%5%10%15%20%25%North East8.2%10.4%North West16.6%19.0%Yorkshire and The Humber7.9%11.6%East Midlands10.3%15.3%West Midlands10.4%13.9%East of England9.5%11.0%London17.9%21.9%South East13.4%15.1%South West14.9%18.7%

Source: Department for Education. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

In order

Ranked by the hub 2025

Every place, the highest figure first. The number before each is the hub's own position in the list, not the publisher's: equal figures share one, marked =.

  1. 1Isles of Scilly100%
  2. 2Havering41.7%
  3. 3Harrow39.8%
  4. 4Swindon34.9%
  5. 5Lewisham32.6%
  6. 6Knowsley31.5%
  7. =7Cheshire East31.3%
  8. =7Tameside31.3%
  9. 9Cumberland29.4%
  10. 10Lambeth29.3%
  11. 11Ealing29.2%
  12. =12Halton29.0%
  13. =12Trafford29.0%
  14. 14Luton28.9%
  15. 15Liverpool28.5%
  16. 16Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole28.3%
  17. 17North Somerset27.7%
  18. =18Sutton25.8%
  19. =18Westmorland and Furness25.8%
  20. =20Middlesbrough25.6%
  21. =20Windsor and Maidenhead25.6%
  22. 22Bolton25.3%
  23. =23Bedford25.0%
  24. =23Isle of Wight25.0%
  25. 25Newham24.8%
  26. 26Sefton24.6%
  27. 27Devon24.3%
  28. 28Bury24.2%
  29. 29Reading23.5%
  30. 30Buckinghamshire23.2%
  31. 31Solihull23.0%
  32. =32Bradford22.2%
  33. =32Merton22.2%
  34. 34South Gloucestershire21.9%
  35. 35Islington21.8%
  36. 36Hackney21.5%
  37. 37Tower Hamlets21.2%
  38. 38Barnet21.1%
  39. 39Medway20.7%
  40. 40Surrey20.6%
  41. 41Oxfordshire20.3%
  42. 42Slough20.0%
  43. 43St. Helens19.5%
  44. 44Thurrock19.4%
  45. 45Southend-on-Sea19.1%
  46. 46Croydon18.9%
  47. 47Peterborough18.4%
  48. 48Herefordshire, County of18.3%
  49. 49Shropshire17.7%
  50. 50Milton Keynes17.5%
  51. 51Central Bedfordshire17.1%
  52. 52Brent16.8%
  53. 53Bracknell Forest16.6%
  54. 54Stoke-on-Trent15.9%
  55. 55Rochdale15.7%
  56. 56Wigan15.6%
  57. 57Barking and Dagenham15.5%
  58. 58Waltham Forest15.4%
  59. =59Oldham15.2%
  60. =59Wakefield15.2%
  61. 61Southwark14.8%
  62. =62Dudley14.5%
  63. =62Redcar and Cleveland14.5%
  64. =62Wokingham14.5%
  65. 65Cheshire West and Chester13.9%
  66. 66Leicester13.8%
  67. 67Cambridgeshire13.4%
  68. 68Kent13.2%
  69. 69Bromley13.1%
  70. 70Barnsley13.0%
  71. 71Haringey12.9%
  72. 72Doncaster12.8%
  73. 73Hounslow12.7%
  74. 74Birmingham12.4%
  75. =75Darlington12.3%
  76. =75Wirral12.3%
  77. 77Dorset12.1%
  78. 78Bexley11.9%
  79. 79Leicestershire11.6%
  80. 80West Berkshire11.4%
  81. =81East Riding of Yorkshire11.1%
  82. =81Worcestershire11.1%
  83. 83Portsmouth10.7%
  84. 84Stockport10.5%
  85. 85Nottingham10.4%
  86. 86Kingston upon Hull, City of10.3%
  87. =87Gloucestershire10.2%
  88. =87Somerset10.2%
  89. 89Gateshead10.0%
  90. =90Sandwell9.9%
  91. =90Wolverhampton9.9%
  92. 92Bath and North East Somerset9.8%
  93. =93Camden9.4%
  94. =93Greenwich9.4%
  95. 95Hampshire9.1%
  96. 96Hillingdon9.0%
  97. =97Plymouth8.8%
  98. =97Staffordshire8.8%
  99. 99North East Lincolnshire8.7%
  100. 100Derbyshire8.6%
  101. 101Torbay8.5%
  102. 102Rutland8.4%
  103. 103North Tyneside8.2%
  104. 104Blackburn with Darwen8.1%
  105. =105County Durham8.0%
  106. =105Redbridge8.0%
  107. =105Southampton8.0%
  108. =105Stockton-on-Tees8.0%
  109. 109Enfield7.9%
  110. =110City of London7.8%
  111. =110Nottinghamshire7.8%
  112. 112Walsall7.7%
  113. =113Blackpool7.4%
  114. =113Hertfordshire7.4%
  115. 115Cornwall7.2%
  116. 116Salford6.3%
  117. 117Coventry6.1%
  118. 118Manchester5.9%
  119. =119Lincolnshire5.8%
  120. =119Newcastle upon Tyne5.8%
  121. 121Calderdale5.7%
  122. 122Suffolk5.6%
  123. 123Wandsworth5.4%
  124. 124Wiltshire4.8%
  125. 125Telford and Wrekin4.0%
  126. 126North Lincolnshire3.9%
  127. 127Lancashire3.6%
  128. 128Hartlepool3.2%
  129. 129Bristol, City of3.0%
  130. 130South Tyneside2.9%
  131. 131Warrington2.3%
  132. 132Hammersmith and Fulham2.2%
  133. =133Leeds2.1%
  134. =133West Sussex2.1%
  135. 135Rotherham1.9%
  136. 136North Yorkshire1.5%
  137. 137Northumberland1.4%
  138. =138Essex1.3%
  139. =138Norfolk1.3%
  140. 140Sheffield0.4%
  141. 141East Sussex0.3%
  142. =142Brighton and Hove0.0%
  143. =142Derby0.0%
  144. =142Kirklees0.0%
  145. =142Warwickshire0.0%
  146. =142York0.0%

No figure published for Barnsley, its area before 1 April 2025 (given under its new code, E08000038), Kensington and Chelsea (not available: “Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster were unable to provide data following a cyberattack in November 2025, which had a significant impact on their information management systems. Because of this, in data sets 1 to 3, figures for these local authorities are not available (indicated by ‘x’), and for data sets 1 to 4 at national and regional level, figures from the previous year were used as best estimates to replace this year’s missing data for these local authorities to calculate totals for England, London, and Inner London.” (the DfE's methodology)), Kingston upon Thames (reported jointly with Richmond upon Thames: “Kingston upon Thames and Richmond upon Thames submit a joint census for each year through Achieving for Children, a social enterprise company created by the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames and the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames to provide their children’s services. As a result of this arrangement their data cannot be broken down to an individual local authority level and is instead reported together against ‘Kingston upon Thames / Richmond upon Thames’.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not divide), North Northamptonshire (reported jointly with West Northamptonshire: “In April 2021, Northamptonshire local authority was replaced with two new unitary authorities, North Northamptonshire and West Northamptonshire. Since 2021, they have submitted a joint census return and data for both unitary authorities is reported against ‘North Northamptonshire / West Northamptonshire’ in this statistics publication.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not divide), Richmond upon Thames (reported jointly with Kingston upon Thames: “Kingston upon Thames and Richmond upon Thames submit a joint census for each year through Achieving for Children, a social enterprise company created by the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames and the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames to provide their children’s services. As a result of this arrangement their data cannot be broken down to an individual local authority level and is instead reported together against ‘Kingston upon Thames / Richmond upon Thames’.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not divide), Sheffield, its area before 1 April 2025 (given under its new code, E08000039), Sunderland (rounds to 0: the Department for Education gives ‘low’, “Rounds to 0, but is not 0” (its data guidance)), West Northamptonshire (reported jointly with North Northamptonshire: “In April 2021, Northamptonshire local authority was replaced with two new unitary authorities, North Northamptonshire and West Northamptonshire. Since 2021, they have submitted a joint census return and data for both unitary authorities is reported against ‘North Northamptonshire / West Northamptonshire’ in this statistics publication.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not divide), Westminster (not available: “Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster were unable to provide data following a cyberattack in November 2025, which had a significant impact on their information management systems. Because of this, in data sets 1 to 3, figures for these local authorities are not available (indicated by ‘x’), and for data sets 1 to 4 at national and regional level, figures from the previous year were used as best estimates to replace this year’s missing data for these local authorities to calculate totals for England, London, and Inner London.” (the DfE's methodology)).

Data table

161 rows

Area20252024
Isles of Scilly E06000053100%100%
Havering E0900001641.7%40.0%
Harrow E0900001539.8%37.1%
Swindon E0600003034.9%28.1%
Lewisham E0900002332.6%28.4%
Knowsley E0800001131.5%21.2%
Cheshire East E0600004931.3%22.3%
Tameside E0800000831.3%44.2%
Cumberland E0600006329.4%31.2%
Lambeth E0900002229.3%43.6%
Ealing E0900000929.2%27.8%
Halton E0600000629.0%44.3%
Trafford E0800000929.0%39.3%
Luton E0600003228.9%24.5%
Liverpool E0800001228.5%17.3%
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole E0600005828.3%33.3%
North Somerset E0600002427.7%29.0%
Westmorland and Furness E0600006425.8%25.5%
Sutton E0900002925.8%16.7%
Middlesbrough E0600000225.6%32.2%
Windsor and Maidenhead E0600004025.6%27.6%
Bolton E0800000125.3%24.0%
Isle of Wight E0600004625.0%24.6%
Bedford E0600005525.0%27.3%
Newham E0900002524.8%24.4%
Sefton E0800001424.6%32.6%
Devon E1000000824.3%30.0%
Bury E0800000224.2%31.5%
Reading E0600003823.5%14.0%
Buckinghamshire E0600006023.2%31.3%
Solihull E0800002923.0%35.0%
Bradford E0800003222.2%31.8%
Merton E0900002422.2%22.1%
South Gloucestershire E0600002521.9%20.4%
Islington E0900001921.8%25.1%
Hackney E0900001221.5%31.7%
Tower Hamlets E0900003021.2%22.9%
Barnet E0900000321.1%29.4%
Medway E0600003520.7%21.1%
Surrey E1000003020.6%27.6%
Oxfordshire E1000002520.3%16.9%
Slough E0600003920.0%22.9%
St. Helens E0800001319.5%23.0%
Thurrock E0600003419.4%24.5%
Southend-on-Sea E0600003319.1%23.7%
Croydon E0900000818.9%30.8%
Peterborough E0600003118.4%35.0%
Herefordshire, County of E0600001918.3%33.9%
Shropshire E0600005117.7%18.6%
Milton Keynes E0600004217.5%16.2%
Central Bedfordshire E0600005617.1%16.9%
Brent E0900000516.8%21.7%
Bracknell Forest E0600003616.6%10.7%
Stoke-on-Trent E0600002115.9%24.2%
Rochdale E0800000515.7%20.3%
Wigan E0800001015.6%15.3%
Barking and Dagenham E0900000215.5%18.6%
Waltham Forest E0900003115.4%28.6%
Oldham E0800000415.2%32.3%
Wakefield E0800003615.2%18.5%
Southwark E0900002814.8%20.1%
Redcar and Cleveland E0600000314.5%13.3%
Wokingham E0600004114.5%13.9%
Dudley E0800002714.5%17.3%
Cheshire West and Chester E0600005013.9%18.8%
Leicester E0600001613.8%20.7%
Cambridgeshire E1000000313.4%22.4%
Kent E1000001613.2%14.0%
Bromley E0900000613.1%12.7%
Barnsley E0800003813.0%given under its old code, E08000016
Haringey E0900001412.9%20.8%
Doncaster E0800001712.8%20.0%
Hounslow E0900001812.7%11.5%
Birmingham E0800002512.4%low reliability: “After the 2024 collection had closed, Birmingham local authority informed the Department that there were data quality issues with the figures they reported in the collection. 2024 data for Birmingham has been provided as ‘u’ in the underlying data for these measures to indicate low reliability.” (the DfE's methodology)
Darlington E0600000512.3%11.8%
Wirral E0800001512.3%18.9%
Dorset E0600005912.1%19.1%
Bexley E0900000411.9%8.8%
Leicestershire E1000001811.6%16.1%
West Berkshire E0600003711.4%11.8%
East Riding of Yorkshire E0600001111.1%9.9%
Worcestershire E1000003411.1%13.0%
Portsmouth E0600004410.7%13.3%
Stockport E0800000710.5%7.3%
Nottingham E0600001810.4%15.5%
Kingston upon Hull, City of E0600001010.3%12.6%
Somerset E0600006610.2%11.0%
Gloucestershire E1000001310.2%17.6%
Gateshead E0800003710.0%9.8%
Sandwell E080000289.9%15.2%
Wolverhampton E080000319.9%14.2%
Bath and North East Somerset E060000229.8%9.9%
Camden E090000079.4%13.0%
Greenwich E090000119.4%16.1%
Hampshire E100000149.1%16.2%
Hillingdon E090000179.0%26.8%
Plymouth E060000268.8%14.9%
Staffordshire E100000288.8%7.6%
North East Lincolnshire E060000128.7%25.1%
Derbyshire E100000078.6%10.0%
Torbay E060000278.5%19.8%
Rutland E060000178.4%15.9%
North Tyneside E080000228.2%12.4%
Blackburn with Darwen E060000088.1%8.8%
Stockton-on-Tees E060000048.0%12.4%
Southampton E060000458.0%2.9%
County Durham E060000478.0%8.9%
Redbridge E090000268.0%7.8%
Enfield E090000107.9%15.4%
City of London E090000017.8%15.4%
Nottinghamshire E100000247.8%16.5%
Walsall E080000307.7%11.2%
Blackpool E060000097.4%5.8%
Hertfordshire E100000157.4%6.1%
Cornwall E060000527.2%9.6%
Salford E080000066.3%11.6%
Coventry E080000266.1%9.3%
Manchester E080000035.9%8.7%
Newcastle upon Tyne E080000215.8%7.0%
Lincolnshire E100000195.8%13.4%
Calderdale E080000335.7%7.5%
Suffolk E100000295.6%3.7%
Wandsworth E090000325.4%8.7%
Wiltshire E060000544.8%7.4%
Telford and Wrekin E060000204.0%3.0%
North Lincolnshire E060000133.9%0.0%
Lancashire E100000173.6%3.6%
Hartlepool E060000013.2%2.0%
Bristol, City of E060000233.0%6.3%
South Tyneside E080000232.9%11.9%
Warrington E060000072.3%9.5%
Hammersmith and Fulham E090000132.2%9.9%
Leeds E080000352.1%5.2%
West Sussex E100000322.1%5.2%
Rotherham E080000181.9%5.9%
North Yorkshire E060000651.5%0.0%
Northumberland E060000571.4%7.1%
Essex E100000121.3%1.1%
Norfolk E100000201.3%3.8%
Sheffield E080000390.4%given under its old code, E08000019
East Sussex E100000110.3%1.3%
York E060000140.0%0.9%
Derby E060000150.0%0.4%
Brighton and Hove E060000430.0%0.0%
Kirklees E080000340.0%0.0%
Warwickshire E100000310.0%4.2%
Barnsley E08000016 its area before 1 April 2025given under its new code, E0800003819.2%
Sheffield E08000019 its area before 1 April 2025given under its new code, E080000392.8%
Sunderland E08000024rounds to 0: the Department for Education gives ‘low’, “Rounds to 0, but is not 0” (its data guidance)rounds to 0: the Department for Education gives ‘low’, “Rounds to 0, but is not 0” (its data guidance)
Kensington and Chelsea E09000020not available: “Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster were unable to provide data following a cyberattack in November 2025, which had a significant impact on their information management systems. Because of this, in data sets 1 to 3, figures for these local authorities are not available (indicated by ‘x’), and for data sets 1 to 4 at national and regional level, figures from the previous year were used as best estimates to replace this year’s missing data for these local authorities to calculate totals for England, London, and Inner London.” (the DfE's methodology)not available: “Analysis during the 2025 publication indicated that the reported numbers of FTE agency workers and FTE agency workers covering vacancies for 2024 were incorrect and significant undercounts of the true figures. FTE agency rates, FTE agency workers covering vacancies rate and FTE vacancy agency cover rate presented as ‘x’ in the underlying data at local authority level to indicate not available.” (the DfE's methodology)
Westminster E09000033not available: “Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster were unable to provide data following a cyberattack in November 2025, which had a significant impact on their information management systems. Because of this, in data sets 1 to 3, figures for these local authorities are not available (indicated by ‘x’), and for data sets 1 to 4 at national and regional level, figures from the previous year were used as best estimates to replace this year’s missing data for these local authorities to calculate totals for England, London, and Inner London.” (the DfE's methodology)not available: “Local authorities may not be able to provide a complete and consistent set of data for all statutory data variables. In this case data is shown as not available (denoted by ‘x’) within the data files.” (the DfE's methodology)
Kingston upon Thames E09000021reported jointly with Richmond upon Thames: “Kingston upon Thames and Richmond upon Thames submit a joint census for each year through Achieving for Children, a social enterprise company created by the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames and the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames to provide their children’s services. As a result of this arrangement their data cannot be broken down to an individual local authority level and is instead reported together against ‘Kingston upon Thames / Richmond upon Thames’.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not dividereported jointly with Richmond upon Thames: “Kingston upon Thames and Richmond upon Thames submit a joint census for each year through Achieving for Children, a social enterprise company created by the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames and the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames to provide their children’s services. As a result of this arrangement their data cannot be broken down to an individual local authority level and is instead reported together against ‘Kingston upon Thames / Richmond upon Thames’.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not divide
North Northamptonshire E06000061reported jointly with West Northamptonshire: “In April 2021, Northamptonshire local authority was replaced with two new unitary authorities, North Northamptonshire and West Northamptonshire. Since 2021, they have submitted a joint census return and data for both unitary authorities is reported against ‘North Northamptonshire / West Northamptonshire’ in this statistics publication.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not dividereported jointly with West Northamptonshire: “In April 2021, Northamptonshire local authority was replaced with two new unitary authorities, North Northamptonshire and West Northamptonshire. Since 2021, they have submitted a joint census return and data for both unitary authorities is reported against ‘North Northamptonshire / West Northamptonshire’ in this statistics publication.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not divide
Richmond upon Thames E09000027reported jointly with Kingston upon Thames: “Kingston upon Thames and Richmond upon Thames submit a joint census for each year through Achieving for Children, a social enterprise company created by the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames and the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames to provide their children’s services. As a result of this arrangement their data cannot be broken down to an individual local authority level and is instead reported together against ‘Kingston upon Thames / Richmond upon Thames’.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not dividereported jointly with Kingston upon Thames: “Kingston upon Thames and Richmond upon Thames submit a joint census for each year through Achieving for Children, a social enterprise company created by the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames and the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames to provide their children’s services. As a result of this arrangement their data cannot be broken down to an individual local authority level and is instead reported together against ‘Kingston upon Thames / Richmond upon Thames’.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not divide
West Northamptonshire E06000062reported jointly with North Northamptonshire: “In April 2021, Northamptonshire local authority was replaced with two new unitary authorities, North Northamptonshire and West Northamptonshire. Since 2021, they have submitted a joint census return and data for both unitary authorities is reported against ‘North Northamptonshire / West Northamptonshire’ in this statistics publication.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not dividereported jointly with North Northamptonshire: “In April 2021, Northamptonshire local authority was replaced with two new unitary authorities, North Northamptonshire and West Northamptonshire. Since 2021, they have submitted a joint census return and data for both unitary authorities is reported against ‘North Northamptonshire / West Northamptonshire’ in this statistics publication.” (the DfE's methodology). The Department for Education gives one figure for the two councils together, which the hub does not divide
North East8.2%10.4%
North West16.6%19.0%
Yorkshire and The Humber7.9%11.6%
East Midlands10.3%15.3%
West Midlands10.4%13.9%
East of England9.5%11.0%
London17.9%21.9%
South East13.4%15.1%
South West14.9%18.7%
England13.0%16.2%

Download CSVDownload JSON with full provenance

Map

2025 · 128 areas, each shaded by the fifth of the areas its figure falls in

  • 0.0% to 7.7%
  • 7.7% to 11.1%
  • 11.1% to 16.6%
  • 16.6% to 24.8%
  • 24.8% to 100%

Boundaries: Council boundaries, May 2026, from the geography spine. Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.3.0. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

Source and licence

Publisher
Department for Education
Check it yourself
https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/children-s-social-work-workforce
Licence
Open Government Licence v3.0 – Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Retrieved
6 November 2026, 06:54 UTC
Raw files fetched

Verification

Latest check failed – showing figures verified against source 6 November 2026, 06:57 UTC Run at 10 November 2026, 11:32 UTC; the latest check failed, so these are the figures that matched the source in full at 6 November 2026, 06:57 UTC; they stand for up to 14 days while the failure is put right.

ResultCheckDetail
PassProvenance recordedDepartment for Education; Open Government Licence v3.0; retrieved 2026-11-06T06:54:54Z; 7 raw file(s)
PassRaw files match recorded SHA-2567 of 7 files intact
PassRe-parsing raw files reproduces figures322 of 322 figures and the headline reproduced; the meta's gap and missing and observations and release and contract_sha256 and register_rows_sha256 match
PassFigures are finite numbers322 figures, 0 invalid
FailLive source matches every figurere-read failed: Stop: held at freshness: the next release is now 'provisional' on '2027-02-28T23:59:59.000+00:00'
Not runSecond official routeNo independent second route to these figures is published; the live re-fetch is the check.
PassThe DfE's stated rates hold2,934 rates, each against the formula the DfE's methodology states, read twice, as the contract expects (rate (stated): 2,871 equal, 50 not given; rate (stated, with exclusions): 11 equal, 2 not checkable); a rate not given or with a part not given is a cell the DfE marks, and the two not checkable leave out a council whose part the DfE marks
PassCouncils, regions and England add up182 sums, the hub's own observations, read twice, as the contract expects (Inner and Outer to London: 14 equal; councils to England: 3 equal, 11 part not given; councils to region: 128 equal, 12 part not given; regions to England: 14 equal); a sum with a part not given holds a cell the DfE marks
PassSource page answershttps://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/children-s-social-work-workforce – HTTP 200

Notes

  • “Child and family social workers are social workers registered with Social Work England (SWE) working in a local authority in a children’s services department or, if working in an authority where the services are joined up, a social worker that works primarily on children and families work. Child and family social workers are employed and paid directly by the local authority.” (the DfE's methodology) “Agency workers are child and family social workers not directly paid by the local authority. These may be social workers who are paid by an agency rather than the local authority or who are self-employed.” (the DfE's methodology)
  • “The agency worker rate is calculated as the number of agency child and family social workers in post at 30 September divided by the sum of the number of agency child and family social workers in post at 30 September and the number of child and family social workers in post at 30 September. This is calculated for both FTE and headcount.” (the DfE's methodology)
  • “FTEs are calculated by aggregating the total number of hours that child and family social workers are contracted to work and dividing by the standard hours for their grade.” (the DfE's methodology)
  • “Figures for full-time equivalents (FTEs), rates, percentages, caseload and working days have been rounded to one decimal place. Therefore component parts may not sum to totals if applicable.” (the DfE's data guidance).
  • The Isles of Scilly had no child and family social workers of its own in post at 30 September 2025 or 2024 (none, full-time equivalent or by headcount), so by the rule above its agency workers were all its child and family social workers in post: the Department for Education gives its agency rate as 100% in both years.
  • In 2024 for Birmingham: “After the 2024 collection had closed, Birmingham local authority informed the Department that there were data quality issues with the figures they reported in the collection. Excluded from the sickness absence figures, sickness absence rates, agency worker rates, agency workers covering vacancies rates and vacancy agency cover rates (Birmingham has also been excluded from the denominator of these rates). 2024 data for Birmingham has been provided as ‘u’ in the underlying data for these measures to indicate low reliability.” (the DfE's methodology) For Kensington and Chelsea: “Analysis during the 2025 publication indicated that the reported numbers of FTE agency workers and FTE agency workers covering vacancies for 2024 were incorrect and significant undercounts of the true figures. Included in the national/regional figures and rates for FTE agency workers and FTE agency workers covering vacancies. FTE agency rates, FTE agency workers covering vacancies rate and FTE vacancy agency cover rate presented as ‘x’ in the underlying data at local authority level to indicate not available.” (the DfE's methodology) For Liverpool: “During the 2025 collection, Liverpool local authority informed DfE that the data they had submitted as part of the 2024 census for agency workers was incorrect and an undercount of the true number. Caution should therefore be taken when interpreting this figure.” (the DfE's methodology)
  • Two pairs of councils make one return: “Kingston upon Thames and Richmond upon Thames submit a joint census for each year through Achieving for Children, a social enterprise company created by the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames and the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames to provide their children’s services. As a result of this arrangement their data cannot be broken down to an individual local authority level and is instead reported together against ‘Kingston upon Thames / Richmond upon Thames’.” (the DfE's methodology) “In April 2021, Northamptonshire local authority was replaced with two new unitary authorities, North Northamptonshire and West Northamptonshire. Since 2021, they have submitted a joint census return and data for both unitary authorities is reported against ‘North Northamptonshire / West Northamptonshire’ in this statistics publication.” (the DfE's methodology) Their joint figures are in the DfE's file and in its regional and national totals; the hub shows the four councils as reported jointly rather than divide the figure.
  • “Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster were unable to provide data following a cyberattack in November 2025, which had a significant impact on their information management systems. Because of this, in data sets 1 to 3, figures for these local authorities are not available (indicated by ‘x’), and for data sets 1 to 4 at national and regional level, figures from the previous year were used as best estimates to replace this year’s missing data for these local authorities to calculate totals for England, London, and Inner London.” (the DfE's methodology) The hub shows those two councils' 2025 figures as not available; London's, Inner London's and England's 2025 figures are the DfE's, with those estimates in them.
  • “In particular, comparisons with earlier years should be made with a degree of caution, as any changes may in part be as a result of improvements in data quality.” (the DfE's methodology)
  • Barnsley and Sheffield are given under their new codes in 2025 and their codes from before 1 April 2025 in 2024, as the Department for Education gives them.
  • The Department for Education publishes these as official statistics: “These statistics have been published as official statistics since the 2019 release, whereas previously they were classified as experimental statistics (now referred to as ‘Official Statistics in Development’).” (the DfE's methodology) Its data is released under the Open Government Licence v3.0, as its data guidance says.